The latest Metacognition Survey try a great 65-goods level regularly gauge the opinions folks have about their thinking


The latest Metacognition Survey try a great 65-goods level regularly gauge the opinions folks have about their thinking

It include four things: positive proper care beliefs (“Alarming helps us to avoid issues subsequently”), opinions from the uncontrollability and you can risk (“My worrying are harmful for my situation”), cognitive competence (“I’ve little believe in my memories to possess conditions and you can labels”), standard bad opinions (“Basically did not handle a distressing consider, following it happened, it could be my blame”), and intellectual self-understanding (“I do believe a lot throughout the my personal viewpoint”). The fresh new metacognition survey is actually obtained in a great cuatro point size out of step one (“do not agree”) in order to cuatro (“concur a whole lot”) together with an excellent Chronbach’s alpha = .88. The metacognition survey has been used widely within the low-clinical examples like cigarette smokers and you can college students [forty two, 45]. An entire rating is calculated to make a list out of metacognition per fellow member.

This new Fanatical-Compulsive Collection are an excellent 42-product mind-report survey, evaluating the severity of certain obsessions and you may compulsions from OCD in the grownups . Brand new fanatical-compulsive list include eight subscales that include laundry (“We clean my hands more frequently or longer than necessary”), checking (“I go returning to locations to make sure that I have not damage people”), doubting (“Even when I really do anything meticulously I believe this isn’t quite correct”), ordering (“I get disappointed in the event that others features changed the way i features arranged my anything”), obsessing (“I’ve found it difficult to handle my personal advice”), hoarding (“We assemble something Really don’t you prefer”), and you will neutralising (“I believe I want to repeat particular wide variety”). That it list try scored on the an effective 4 part Likert size, in one (“not at all”) to cuatro (“extremely”) and had good Chronbach’s alpha = .88. A complete score is actually determined in order to create you to definitely score for every participant about O-C symptoms.


The possibility shot out-of college students took part in the study. Members had been firstly served with information regarding the analysis and you will given the ability to inquire about any of it. Immediately after providing consent, for each fellow member considering group suggestions, then was indeed served with brand new five forms inside an excellent counterbalanced buy to respond to at the their own go out. If new member accomplished he/she was thanked and you can debriefed. Most of the information and functions observed the newest ethical assistance and functions in depth by the Western Mental Relationship and you can was in fact searched and you will acknowledged by the College or university from Hertfordshire integrity panel (Number:14149216).


Investigation was processed to possess missing thinking, outliers and presumptions out-of analytical research prior to one investigation . All parameters got acceptable viewpoints for skewness and you can kurtosis and no high outliers. Bivariate correlations of one’s many all of the computed spiders revealed self-confident and tall associations among them (Desk step one). The strongest relationship was within indexes regarding county and characteristic stress, accompanied by brand new organization anywhere between anxiety susceptibility, metacognition and you can O-C attacks.

Our first prediction was that metacognition and anxiety (state and trait) would be significant predictors of O-C symptoms. Consistent with our expectations all variables were associated to O-C symptoms in significant and positive correlations (all ps < .001) [24, 30, 33].

In order to investigate the relative importance of each of the computed index on the prediction of O-C symptoms all the indexes were used as simultaneous predictors of O-C symptoms in a multivariate regression analysis. Results revealed that metacognition was the best predictor of O-C symptoms (? = .41, p < .001), followed by trait anxiety (? = .21, p < .05), state anxiety (? = .16, p = .08), and anxiety sensitivity (? = .04, p = .63). The overall model resulted significant, R 2 = .49, F(4, 151) = , p < .001). Although previous research indicated that anxiety sensitivity is a good predictor of O-C symptoms , the inclusion of the other variables reduced its effect to a non-significant level.

Comments (0)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.